ABSTRACT
Context: In platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, single-agent chemotherapy is recommended for the reduction of adverse events. However, in clinical practice, some patients can tolerate drug-specific adverse events. Aims: We assessed the safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PEG-LD) and docetaxel regimen in the first cycle of ovarian cancer. Settings and Design: We performed a phase I study to evaluate the combination therapy of PEG-LD and docetaxel. Materials and Methods: We recruited five patients with recurrent ovarian cancer within 12 months of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. All patients had measurable disease severity. PEG-LD and docetaxel were intravenously administered on day 1 and every 21 days using three dose levels: 25 mg/m2 PEG-LD and 50 mg/m2 docetaxel; 30 mg/m2 PEG-LD and 50 mg/m2 docetaxel; and 30 mg/m2 PEG-LD and 60 mg/m2 docetaxel. Statistical Analysis Used: We defined the maximum tolerated dose of the combination therapy based on the modified Fibonacci method. Results: Five patients were enrolled in this study. The median treatment-free interval was 5.5 months. Two dose-limiting toxicities (Grade 4 neutropenia) were observed in two patients. One complete response, one partial response, one stable disease, and two progressive disease cases were observed. The overall response rate was 2/5, and the disease control rate was 3/5. The median overall survival was 7.4 months. Conclusions: We determined that 25 mg/m2 of PEG-LD and 50 mg/m2 of docetaxel were safe and effective doses. This preliminary efficacy and safety data should be further investigated in a Phase II trial.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: In our institutional experience, involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) yields favorable outcomes in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This retrospective study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of IFRT in this patient population. METHODS: Among patients treated with IFRT for recurrent EOC between 2010 and 2017, 61 patients with 90 treatments were included. IFRT encompassed all treatable lesions identified via imaging studies with 10–15-mm margins. Prescribed doses were ≥45 Gy (equivalent dose in 2 Gy/fraction). RESULTS: Patients were followed up for a median of 19.0 (Interquartile range, 8.6–34.9) months after IFRT. The 2-year in-field control, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) rates were 42.7%, 24.2%, and 78.9%, respectively. Fifty-three IFRT sessions (58.9%) were followed by systemic chemotherapy, and the median chemotherapy-free interval (CFI) was 10.5 (95% confidence interval=7.3–13.7) months. A higher carbohydrate antigen-125 (CA-125) level correlated with a worse 2-year OS (69.2% vs. 91.0%; p=0.001) and shorter median CFI (4.7 vs. 11.9 months; p12 months. For patients with a normal CA-125 level and/or platinum-sensitive tumor, IFRT prolonged CFI regardless of pre-existing carcinomatosis, gross tumor volume, and number of treatment sites. CONCLUSION: Our early experience demonstrates the safety and feasibility of IFRT as an effective salvage therapy and enables a “chemotherapy holiday” in selected recurrent EOC settings. The CA-125 value before IFRT (within normal range) and/or platinum sensitivity could be used as selection criteria for IFRT.